wjsullivan.net

Overloading the Machine

Potato-Asparagus Soup

Based on the Vegan with a Vengeance recipe by Isa Chandra Moskowitz

Serves 8.

3 pounds russet potatoes, peeled, cut into 1-inch chunks
1 pound asparagus, rough ends discarded, tips cut into 2-inch pieces, lower part cut into 1/2-inch pieces
2 tablespoons olive oil
1 large onion, cut into 1/2 inch dice
3 cloves garlic, minced
1 teaspoon salt
a few dashes fresh black pepper
4 cups vegetable broth, or 2 bouillon cubes dissolved in 4 cups water
2 bay leaves
juice of 1 lemon
1/4 cup chopped fresh dill

Place potatoes in a stockpot and cover with cold water. Cover the pot and bring to a boil, then lower the heat and simmer for 20 minutes or until tender. Add the asparagus, boil for 3 minutes, drain, and set aside.

Rinse out the pot, then in the same pot sauté the onion in the olive oil for 5 to 7 minutes; add the garlic, salt and black pepper; and sauté 2 more minutes. Add the broth and bay leaves, boil for 10 minutes, discard the bay leaves. Add the potatoes and asparagus, heat through, then puree three-quarters of the soup in a blender or food processor. Reheat if necessary. Add a squeeze of lemon and serve garnished with fresh dill.

Notes

If you like a chunkier soup (like I do), just puree half of it. Or maybe just use a potato masher?

I haven't made this yet.

Books were printed only on printing presses until recently. It was possible to make a copy yourself by hand, but it wasn't practical because it took so much more work than using a printing press. And it produced something so much less attractive that, for all intents and purposes, you could act as if it were impossible to make books except by mass producing them. And therefore copyright didn't really take any freedom away from the reading public. There wasn't anything that a book purchaser could do that was forbidden by copyright. But this isn't true for computer programs. It's also not true for tape cassettes. It's partly false now for books, but it is still true that for most books it is more expensive and certainly a lot more work to Xerox them than to buy a copy, and the result is still less attractive. Right now we are in a period where the situation that made copyright harmless and acceptable is changing to a situation where copyright will become destructive and intolerable. So the people who are slandered as “pirates” are in fact the people who are trying to do something useful that they have been forbidden to do. The copyright laws are entirely designed to help people take complete control over the use of some information for their own good. But they aren't designed to help people who want to make sure that the information is accessible to the public and stop others from depriving the public. I think that the law should recognize a class of works that are owned by the public, which is different from public domain in the same sense that a public park is different from something found in a garbage can. It's not there for anybody to take away, it's there for everyone to use but for no one to impede. Anybody in the public who finds himself being deprived of the derivative work of something owned by the public should be able to sue about it.

-- Richard Stallman, interview in BYTE, 1986

This page was last modified on 2011 December 20.